Partial Differential Equations: Verification, Formation, and Classification
Published on September 19, 2025
Calculus
Solve problems involving partial derivatives, including verifying solutions to PDEs and classifying PDEs based on their discriminant.
Question
Answer
Here’s a step-by-step solution to the math problems presented in the image.
Part (A): Prove that the given function is a solution to the partial differential equation.
i) Given: and the PDE:
First, find the partial derivatives of with respect to and .
Now, substitute these into the PDE:
Since , the equation holds true.
Therefore, is a solution to .
ii) Given: and the PDE:
First, find the partial derivatives of with respect to and .
Now, substitute these into the PDE:
This equation is not generally true for all and . For example, if , then , which is impossible.
Therefore, is not a solution to . (Self-correction: There might be a typo in the problem statement or my interpretation. Assuming the problem asks to verify if it’s a solution, the answer is no based on the calculations. If it was meant to be , then it would be a solution.)
Let’s re-check the problem statement. It clearly says . So, the conclusion stands.
Part (B): Find the partial differential equation for each of the following functions.
This part asks to eliminate arbitrary constants to form a PDE.
i) Given:
We have two arbitrary constants, and . We need to find at least two partial derivatives to eliminate them.
From , we have .
From , we have .
Substitute into :
So, . This is a PDE involving and .
Let’s try to eliminate both and using and .
We have .
From , substitute :
Now, differentiate this with respect to :
From , we have .
Substitute this into the expression for :
Now, differentiate this with respect to :
From , we have .
Substitute back into :
So, the PDE is:
or
ii) Given:
We have two arbitrary constants, and .
Differentiate with respect to : (Equation 1)
Differentiate with respect to : (Equation 2)
From Equation 1, .
Substitute into Equation 2:
Since , we can divide by : (Equation 3)
Now we need to eliminate . Differentiate Equation 3 with respect to : (Equation 4)
Differentiate Equation 3 with respect to : (Equation 5)
This approach seems complicated. Let’s try a different strategy.
From , we have .
From , we have .
Substitute :
Now we have expressions for and . We need to find a PDE that doesn’t contain or .
Let’s differentiate with respect to : (Equation A)
Let’s differentiate with respect to : (Equation B)
Since (assuming sufficient smoothness), we can equate the terms.
From (A):
From (B):
So,
This is the same expression for we found earlier. We still need to eliminate and .
Let’s try differentiating with respect to :
So, .
Now we have two expressions for :
Assuming and :
This is a PDE that does not contain or .
iii) Given:
We have one arbitrary constant, . We need to find one partial derivative to eliminate it.
From this, .
Calculate the limit of the natural logarithm of (1+1/x) raised to the power of 2x as x approaches infinity, using logarithm properties and known limits or L'Hopital's rule.